This is cool, but the multiple use of the same subject makes it look more like a chop than a panorama (I am NOT saying this is off theme - I'm just talking impressions. Others will obviously disagree)
author says:
how can it be a chop? the guy is just moved forward in each shot before it is taken, simple! if you look, he is in a different stance in each one, and there was nothing in the guide to say I couldn't do this.
unsual purpose for panorama view but creative and its a good presentation. GL.
jawshoewhah [banned] says:
I think it's a great idea and I don't see anything wrong with it but why didn't you at least shoot the guy from the other side? Shooting directly towards the sun just makes him look a little dark.
author says:
cos if I had of done, there would have been nothing to see in the background.
Howdie stranger! If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
This is a VERY nice image... but I'm not sure two shots qualifies as a "panorama"
author says:
Do I sense a debate coming
I know it's not the New English Oxford bla bla bla, but... Merriam says:
A picture representing scenes too extended to be beheld at once, and so exhibited a part at a time, by being unrolled, and made to pass continuously before the spectator. [1913 Webster] Panoramic
At first this may seem like just a cropped single frame image but this was actually 2 images taken with a 10-22mm lens backed all the way down to 10mm therefore it fit's into the "too extended to behold" category.
different, well done.
Now that's a neat idea
Clever..
This is cool, but the multiple use of the same subject makes it look more like a chop than a panorama (I am NOT saying this is off theme - I'm just talking impressions. Others will obviously disagree)
how can it be a chop? the guy is just moved forward in each shot before it is taken, simple! if you look, he is in a different stance in each one, and there was nothing in the guide to say I couldn't do this.
unsual purpose for panorama view but creative and its a good presentation. GL.
I think it's a great idea and I don't see anything wrong with it but why didn't you at least shoot the guy from the other side? Shooting directly towards the sun just makes him look a little dark.
cos if I had of done, there would have been nothing to see in the background.
Howdie stranger!
If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE