Not so sure!
The term yesterdays is unusual and often poetic for the recent past, e.g. "all our yesterdays have come back to haunt us."
- If the restaurant owner's name was Yesterday, there would be an apostrophe required to show possession.
- If the intended meaning is "The Recent Past Restaurant.", there would be no apostrophe.
You're probably right about their intent... but... if you want to get technical you'd look at it with the term "restaurant" included which would be the noun which is the object of a sentence, making the term "yesterdays" the/a modifier, in this case implying possession - which of course would need an apostrophe. If it were remembering the past, it would be something like "restaurant of yesterdays"
They need an apostrophe
Not so sure!
The term yesterdays is unusual and often poetic for the recent past, e.g. "all our yesterdays have come back to haunt us."
- If the restaurant owner's name was Yesterday, there would be an apostrophe required to show possession.
- If the intended meaning is "The Recent Past Restaurant.", there would be no apostrophe.
interesting replay. thank
the photo makes me think of a movie that I loved, Easy Ryder, beautiful music, fine photo, bravo
You're probably right about their intent... but... if you want to get technical you'd look at it with the term "restaurant" included which would be the noun which is the object of a sentence, making the term "yesterdays" the/a modifier, in this case implying possession - which of course would need an apostrophe. If it were remembering the past, it would be something like "restaurant of yesterdays"
Any grammar teachers out there?
ummmmm... yes
Howdie stranger!
If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE