(5 years and 2230 days ago)
- photo contests ▼
- photoshop contests ▼
- Tutorials ▼
- Social ▼Contact options
- Stats ▼Results and stats
- More ▼
- Help ▼Help and rules
- Login
Five month by Artifakts 7465 views - final score: 70.2% | torso by kyricom 5617 views - final score: 69.1% | Add a title... by Eris 4859 views - final score: 65.3% |
hand in hand by janoogee 7432 views - final score: 65.1% | . by Eris 3268 views - final score: 64.9% | battle of the bulge by janoogee 5197 views - final score: 63.1% |
_Add a title... by Eris 2943 views - final score: 61.6% | Feeling Blue by friiskiwi 2660 views - final score: 58.6% | Male by friiskiwi 2344 views - final score: 57.3% |
Swimming by janoogee 4974 views - final score: 50.3% | Wayne [some Sunday, circa 1985] by awediot 1998 views - final score: 48.3% |
Howdie Guest!
You need to be logged in to rate this entry and participate in the contests!
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE
note...this is one of those cutting edge Polaroid pictures that squeezed out of the camera, and developed magically right before your eyes... I just scanned it, so I'd have, and be able to post it if the situation came up... [thus the funky quality]
Are you bragging or apologising?
Apologize for bragging...brag for apologizing. (clear as mud when the best education teaches us to ask better questions...) - That's what happens when we have to crop the heads off...
Yes, strange part of the the goal, most 'bodies' look better with a head.
Honestly, I appreciate the desire to take part in these contests but,
is this not way sub-par and counter to the goal of this site?
Just my opinion.
Agreed...and not... "Is this supposed to be 'art', or just perfect photography? What's the difference? Is the image "way sub-par" because of the odd quality, or because it's a candid shot of a guy fixing a vacuum cleaner in his underwear rather than a black and white nude beauty lit just so? - Of course we have to judge according to some objective, universal standard that exist for good reasons. We also have to be fluid enough to set those dry RULES of Art aside sometimes.
[not to mention it being a depiction of a body... Sub-par and counter to a goal probably describes most of them...]
Excuse me author but, MymindsEye is right.
I don't agree with what you say about "art" or "perfect photography".
So, according to your words "art" is not perfect ?
IMHO, It's not because your picture depicts "a guy fixing a vacuum cleaner" that I don't find it a good picture. For me it's because the quality is poor, because absolutely nothing is focussed (where can the eye attention be attracted ?), because the framing is strange, because a fiew elements are disturbing the attention, because for me your force line leads to the vacuum (or here, the main subject should be the body)...
If for you it's not a "photography", don't call it "art" either please !
EXACTLY.
Kudos Artifakts!
Howdie stranger!
If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE