I had thought of this too, but there was something about nothing you can eat? and I guess you can still scrape it up and eat it?

I think this one fits, because the goal says: 'One exception: you can not eat the object'. In this context, it means: it is not allowed to eat the object.

I'm with friiskiwi... I was going to do this shot, but didn't because you can obviously eat eggs. Nice shot, though

As suggester of this theme: IMHO this entry is on theme, the purpose of mentioning the food was that it didn't got eaten (as stated), disallowing using food however was never my intention AND was not stated in the description.

spot on Author

Oh Nooooooooooo....not the egg. nice job Hi Res looks great.

No, sorry... "as stated" - "you can not eat the object." That phrase changed a lot of potential entries. Absolutely none of the other ones have anything edible. You can obviously eat an egg. Sorry, author, this one shouldn't be allowed either

I think there is difference between 'you can not eat the object' and 'the object can not be edible'. The first phrase - what was used in the contest description - allows to use food as an object, but the second photo can not be the result of preparing or starting to eat the food. For example, an egg+omelet would be definitely off theme. The author simply dropped the egg to the ground and it was smashed. And yes, you can obviously eat an egg, but not the egg what was used as object in this case. I don't think the author licked up the smashed egg from the ground.

I like like carousel's rebuttal

What a creative shot! very nice work here

LOL i thought this was deleted. As to the eating, i read it as you cannot destroy the object by eating it. @carousel, nope i didnt eat it, though i a partial to dirt and stones every now and then. LOL