Try putting a motion blur in the flying glass. It will give it more of a moving fast effect and give it more depth, like the bullet but less blurred. GL!

on the broken peices try and place a reflection on them they look a little bit too solid ATM aswell but this is looking very cool ! g/l Author

Agreed, perhaps some transparancy on the shattered pieces too

The sense of motion and the reflectivity of the glass is looking better. I like it!

Looks quite ok. If you see the boy in the background and then the hole in the glass and connect these 2 with an imaginary line, I'd expect the bullit going up instead of down. A possible nice thing about moving the bullit more higher is that you look against it which gives it a more impressive angle (you may want to make it a bit bigger too for an exaggerated perspective effect, is up to you). Good luck!

nice work ....

Good work. I agree with Waz about the trajectory, and the others about a reflection of the broken pieces. Not mandatory, but a nice little touch. Good luck.

like it

:lol::lol: that's super funny !!!

The fist should really be in contact with her face.

agrees with the gamer

ok thank you!! i'll change the fist. how do you do thumb up on people's comment?

my stuff / my contests...

Or you can enter the code... !
Well, I agree with Game too... but NEVER do that, even with a feather!

LOL well done

Hmm... if she had two teeth broken... you could show us where do they come from!

ouch....... that was hard..!! GL

Very nice...poor busty lady...lol

thanks for comments

hahahhahahaha funny

lol that's so funny

whappakkkk! you hit the spot in me funny bones!

lol hammer down good chop Author.

that spit flying from her mouth is so gross!! LOVE IT! GL!

How did you do the shattered glass? Put it on a sbs to show us!...
Btw, pieces are a bit flat, maybe a bevel and emboss effect would be good.

This is off-theme because the high speed motion photography is not accurately understood. Let see other comment of mine, you will know why I said that: http://www.pxleyes.com/photoshop-picture/4bbc16b3d1a92/Running-on-water.html

Actually, Langstrum, I think this should be okay. It's capturing the shattering of glass at high-speed, no? My only suggestions would be to remove the repeated glass as this is not something that would be captured in high-speed, and maybe rather a motion blur. Also, the shattered glass seems a bit of a mess and it's hard to distinguish properly.

Hey ......what can I say. I have never broken a glass before. Thanx for all the input. It will help me on getting better. Good luck to all.

coooool....

Nice source choice, needs more action.

agrees with Barnacle... (I know, again I actually agree with them)

Picture of the beach is copyrighted so i dont think u can keep it as is..aside from that, the jogger needs some kind of shadow..but good idea!

The idea is not good, because author misunderstood the concept of high speed motion photography. With this technique, the camera can take photo with the speed of 128 frames/s and even much higher. Presume we use this speed, so this photo was captured within 1/128s. Calculate from the first image of this person to the last image on the left, he "joggled"around 2m --> his speed is around 2m per 1/128s or 256m/s or 921km/h, that means 0.7 sound speed . Just the funny demonstration, hope that author will understand this concept correctly. For that matter, you should capture the image of only one person in this photo, so no different between the normal photo and high speed motion photo can be observed, this is why the target of high speed motion photo is always the object moving with the ultra high speed such as the bullet.
EIDT: Oops, this is a lady

Sorry, langstrum is right (I should have read the contest goal)..hopefully u have time to change it though..

If you can replace the copyrighted background, keep in mind that someone going that fast would kick up a heck of a wake!

Only Cyborg or Bionic Woman could do it...

The Flash could do it at the speed of sound... ;]

the duplicated jogger takes away from the image... basically you would get that repeated image look with a long exposure camera not a highspeed.

think of it this way, you are catching a split second of a moment... view a few of the other entries in he contest to get a good idea of what the contest is looking for...

also the shadow of the jogger does not match the light source for the background... and the lighting of the jogger is opposite of both the background light source and the shadow added...

GL!!

Agrees with bjaockx. And for future reference , try to upload something a lot higher resolution.