gee.. all I see is the source.. and an excellent job of reprogramming it into another image.. but then I used to dream I was trapped in the double helix of a DNA molecule go figure.. really love this one
(author..you should post screen shots of the numerations and calculations.. it would be a big help to those who don't understand the conversions into 3d/4d)
CMYK46.. do you see the structure.. do you see the shapes... do you see the design... do you see the work involved... (I know self imagination is hard for you, but not everything has to come from somebody else) math IS considered an Art Form
I am not sure if he used the exactly shapes on the soruce, for example the surrounding stones are triangles on his entry and on the source they're not. But well since it's all similar i guess it's valid.
well, it´s definatly a recreation. i understand Golem, and the work thats in it, but i totally understand CM too. It´s a diffrent way to a solution. Normally you use parts of the source image in your image. But time has changed. a reproduction of a source with a 3d programm is valid i think. It´s definitly not mine, but thats ok. For you author, you could use the original stonetexture form source to place it with the texture you´ve used. So you combound the source with your image more. good luck
thx all for comm...good or bad!....and by the way mqrtf check this pls!....http://www.pxleyes.com/photoshop-contest/4580/tape-recorder.html ( look who's talking!!)....I could say the same: - I don't see were you used this photo?)) I mean if you want further examples, or let us see each of our talent!!! gl....
I understand the controversy around this creation.....but.....since moderators haven't removed it....well.....we need to vote! And despite all that.....it is truely a very good image, which proves excellent imagination, a very good eye for colors and, of course, a magnificent technique...! Best of luck!
Howdie stranger! If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
Very colorful....I love the tones and you've got an excellent eye for color combinations! And you've got quite an imagination to come up with something like that! Best of luck!
Howdie stranger! If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
well recreated. whish you had use parts of the source image
It's interesting, but I'd suggest revising so you use part of the source pic...
gee.. all I see is the source.. and an excellent job of reprogramming it into another image.. but then I used to dream I was trapped in the double helix of a DNA molecule go figure.. really love this one
(author..you should post screen shots of the numerations and calculations.. it would be a big help to those who don't understand the conversions into 3d/4d)
Golem, do you see bricks in the source pic? Do you see any gray stones or concrete in this pic?
cool
CMYK46.. do you see the structure.. do you see the shapes... do you see the design... do you see the work involved... (I know self imagination is hard for you, but not everything has to come from somebody else) math IS considered an Art Form
I am not sure if he used the exactly shapes on the soruce, for example the surrounding stones are triangles on his entry and on the source they're not. But well since it's all similar i guess it's valid.
Nice work, like the whole 3D look but i would like to see the source used, good luck anyways
well, it´s definatly a recreation. i understand Golem, and the work thats in it, but i totally understand CM too. It´s a diffrent way to a solution. Normally you use parts of the source image in your image. But time has changed. a reproduction of a source with a 3d programm is valid i think. It´s definitly not mine, but thats ok. For you author, you could use the original stonetexture form source to place it with the texture you´ve used. So you combound the source with your image more. good luck
This is crazy! Good luck!
i agree with cmyk46.. what you could do is take the texture of the boomerang shaped stones and put it on your 3d ones..
NIce idea but the bricks are a little bit small compared to the rest.
I dont get it isnt this a "phtoshop" contest? can we use 3d?
I don't see were you used my photo
great 3d picture.. but i cant see the sources...
i like the colors, good work and good luck
thx all for comm...good or bad!....and by the way mqrtf check this pls!....http://www.pxleyes.com/photoshop-contest/4580/tape-recorder.html ( look who's talking!!)....I could say the same: - I don't see were you used this photo?)) I mean if you want further examples, or let us see each of our talent!!! gl....
nice 3d composition but i can't see the source there apart from some shapes that resemble parts of it
wow....go mets LOL
i think that you must insert all image source and not a source for all
very nice
The reflection on the bat seems to finish too sharp for me. Plus I really can't see where the source has been used
cool!
I understand the controversy around this creation.....but.....since moderators haven't removed it....well.....we need to vote! And despite all that.....it is truely a very good image, which proves excellent imagination, a very good eye for colors and, of course, a magnificent technique...! Best of luck!
Howdie stranger!
If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE