excellent!!!

EDIT: I noticed very good job author

The whole face changes when someone smiles...you changed the mouth but there are no smile lines on the face, and the eyes should smile more too...a smile is half in the eyes.

to be honest I changed mouth, eyebrows, eyes and cheeks, but just a little because I wanted a simple smile... Anyway you're right ^^

I really like, how good you drew her teeth! Very good job on that! Good luck

Great job on her face, you can see the smile in her eyes!

This is pretty good...however I think the eyes need to squint more on the sad side. Humans tend to squint their eyes when they cry.

Thanks pixelkid, I'll try to do it tomorrow.

pretty good.. the tears don't look good, lower the opacity (a lot)

I ditto what Pixelkid and Elficho said. But I really like how you changed the mouth. That looks very convincing And I think, that I don't have to mention, what a cute little kid that is Good luck!

I love how you changed the mouth. Her eyes still look happy though and the tears kinda look like pearls. *I don't know how to make clear tears either, so I won't hold it against you!*

Thank you guys for all your suggestions. I did squint baby's eyes a bit, and reduced opacity of the tears layer down to 10% Still it doesn't look real. I guess need to make skin look wet, but I don't know how. Thank you again for your help.

it's the eyes too.. they should be red if the kid's crying

OH NO YOU DIDN'T!!! .. awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwweeeeeeeeeeeeee

if cat's could cry.. that's EXACTLY how they would do it

I'm going to try to help you author. You need to improve a lot of things like: the eyes(to distorted) / the fur at the top head(looks fake and blurry) / the mustache hair(strange) / mouth and nose (too blurry). Instead liquify, why not warp? Another help: happy or sad the pupil / iris and cornea must be the same. Sometimes the pupil with some changes (small or big). That's the eyes anatomy.

i agree 100%

HavingFun advices are excellent.Myself learn a lot from what he said. I dont think all advices are good for this particular entry. For me is obvious that author humanize the cat. Is not realistic but is very expressive. Even if is anatomycal wrong.

HavinFun .. yr right ... but as BillyBoy said .. i was trying to get the cat more pixar than lifelike ...

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa i'm gonna cryyy..

oh so cute!

How Cute

Sweet sad kitty, but maybe you wanna make the other cat look a bit more happy? Good luck!

reminds me of Shrek lol well done author, i think its cute as

Awww...that is adorable

Great job!

How fun is this?!!!!!

Good job! Especially on his eyes. And I really like how you made the wrinkles next to his nose. Good luck

good job Author

ACK.. Author.. Red Flag this yourself and make sure it's okay to use her image (I know its public domain but better safe then sorry) I got a warning on the old PST when I used a painting as a REF and it was public domain... just cover your rump... I LOVE THIS!!!

Thanks, Golem. Nobody can be sure on a PXL rule. I never red flag and i'll not begin with myself. From what i understood is a very strange rule. I can use a painting as source but not as reference.
”However, as soon as the reference is used as an one on one copy or trace, it won't be seen as reference anymore but as source. In that case ONLY copyrightfree photos can be used to be traced.”
I shall ask for a second opinion to Dan Brown

this will get pulled.. a member on this site had the same problem about a month ago, they removed the entry

Elficho, maybe i have a friendly relationship with Mods
Anyway, Louvre site ask me permission to publish that masterpiece

Great Image.........but becareful..........hope you don't get cut