not bad coloring

Coloring doesnt look bad indeed, but (contest goal): "(Don't take a photo that's crystal clear and all you have to do is to color it) - take something old or even damaged". Good luck!

this was taken in 1952, but is it not old enough.

I think what the goal is suggesting is that you take an old 'damaged' photo, repair it, then color it...although, the wording does actually say....' - take something old or even damaged'......that does not say to me that 'damaged' is compulsory!!!

Well, it shouldn't be damaged, but IMO this was to simple. You just colored it and replaced the sky... It is still blurry and all. But still, that's not a reason to me for it's removal =) GL, hope you improve.

I think the coloring job is pretty good, it still that older feel to it though.

I don't think many of these were real complicated, stamp, clone, and color; when it's worded that way. It actually is quite technical making the colors blend and look realistic. Thanks for your honest opinions, and vote accordingly. I really like the way it turned out.

Not bad, but you should have colored over the shadow...

In high res, parts of the color seem a bit blotchy and hard edged. A repaired damaged photo may not be a prerequisite but it does help your score as far as showing your skills for repair. .

hey! great job!!! I like it

nice one...one of the better entries

best of all ... just continue>>

excellent