(5 years and 3590 days ago)
3 Sources:
Chains by CorneliaMladenova 7808 views - final score: 63.8% | Dolphin playground by Graphopoly 11351 views - final score: 59.6% | Ammonia by Suky04 9073 views - final score: 56.4% |
Flintstones Laundromat by Graphopoly 8238 views - final score: 56.4% | Turkey, Foliage and Succulent by Drivenslush 10403 views - final score: 55.5% | imagination-station by spygirl1978 2905 views - final score: 54.6% |
Poker chips by Aloisnin 8273 views - final score: 54.4% | locked up.... by spygirl1978 3677 views - final score: 53.9% | Red's Turn by Drivenslush 3383 views - final score: 52.8% |
Hollywood No More by fatz8016 4899 views - final score: 52.7% | Recess by SulliGirl 3119 views - final score: 52.5% | Hot Tub by DigitalPro 4970 views - final score: 51.6% |
Last Resorts by erathion 6375 views - final score: 51.4% | parrot toy by demi 4112 views - final score: 51.2% | The Art Critic by Drivenslush 3917 views - final score: 51.2% |
chain neckless by ivankokuti 4545 views - final score: 48% |
Howdie Guest!
You need to be logged in to rate this entry and participate in the contests!
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE
The background looks quite distorted, when scaling objects in photoshop remember to hold the Shift key to maintain proportions.
Hi everyone! I'm going to give this photo a failing grading for two reasons 1) its mine, you can see the originall here: http://www.guildphotos.com/bestofwaterwold/h56aab41#h56aab41 and 2) its got a dumb looking structure superimposed. By the way, I'm a lawyer, this image has a copyright and I LOVE a good law suit. Bring it on! - John Guild
perspective..
EDIT: Looks better, but first i dont know what the water on the middle of the table is..? and if it's supposed to be like deep, it doesnt seem like that. and the blurring is different between source pic and background.. either ways,, pretty good
Sorry John, thank you for pointing it out. I found this picture on flickr.com using the advanced search with settings to "Only search within the Creative Commons-licensed content: Find content to modify, adapt, or build upon". I will go ahead and change the background. (You may want to contact the flickr user to see why your copyrighted picture was under the Creative Commons licensed pictures.)
Author, I completely understand Creative Commons as I was part of the group involved. Under the conditions set you where were suppose to acknowledge Attribution; instead the image was posted without my signature which was apparently cut off before posting here. You picked the wrong guy my friend. I could have easily pulled a Scott Bourne on you. Your lucky day. I have no more to say about this subject nor will I be visiting this site again. Just stay away from my stuff. Case closed, take care, John Guild
on the left it kindof looks as if were just plopped there....
points55, maXed, Jgrafix thank you for your constructive comments, I changed the background and made few adjustments.
Really creative! Looks real
Author, screw that guy! It's his own damn fault he listed the image on flickr under a creaetive commons license. He's probably not even a lawyer. I hope he's serious about not comming back though.
I agree with you jawshoewhah, he only joined to stir things up. I don't think he truely understands what Creative Commons means. I doubt he is a lawyer...he just plays one on tv.
First one was better,its shame why u have to change that one....
great
Howdie stranger!
If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE