good job !

spectacualar sci fi piece... though I think it's TOO well done to be a hoax..(IMHO) (Fantastic image all round.. and very good luck)

LOL

That is really cool, however, I wish the baby were in the same focus as the rest of the picture. Everything has a nice Gaussian blur to it and that baby is just crystal clear. Evening out the tones and sharpness of the three main items would really add to the painterly quality of it. Nice job overall though for sure!

thanks elinoree! for the bg part i was attempting to create a bit of depth by having distant objects less in focus... and the baby is in focus becase it is the main object, as is the dad, jsut the dad is swaying slightly in the air which is why he is less in focus... guess if i have to explain it i didn't do a good enough job showing it ;] Thanks for your thoughtful input!

lol... funny

The idea is good, I really like it, but execution needs some improvements. Looks like you're hiding some mistakes on the layer of the father by blurring. You can say it because of the DOF, it's alright, but I can't imagine the father is not in the same plane with the child (because the his shadow is as sharp as the shadow of his kid). Moreover, the right hand of the father needs to be recovered, looks like he loses fingers. Just my opinion, don't take it offensive. Good luck, author

no i was not covering up any mistakes... all blur added was simply for effect... i think i can stand to blur the father's shadow a bit more... thanks for your comments!!! ;]

i like this...

Nice one...gl

what a great idea funny

I think a better source image would have eliminated a lot of your problems to begin with.

she's on steriods!!!!!!!

Stop effing around & credit your sources or remove them. Even if you do, the M16 doesn't belong at Normandy

I don't really get where you used source ... upload sbs and ditch the text \

hey CMYK46, buddy boy, I credited them. So wtf are u talking about big boy. And thaks for the advice on the m16, maybe a little nicer tone next time but thanks anyway

Allow me to reiterate: There is a clear shadow of an M16 here, which did not exist at the time of Normandy, and the type placement would be better suited to the empty space at top of image. As for the remainder of your diatribe, it's referring to my comment about your image before you chose to alter it and change your comments from private to public.

I did change it now. So I do appreciate the comments CMYK. i do see that it was an m16, hopefully it looks a little different now. hahah. Thank you though

just ditch the text all together it makes the image blah

nice may be better without the text and plane

Ya agree with lamantine and jellopudding....remove the text and the plane...

nice sentiment, but it's a new image really... imo poor use of source...sorry

Nice image, but I agree with others that the source is very minimal and difficult to visualize. Good Luck anyway!

Minimal source used and I hate agreeing with her but the pudding girl is right.

Very cute, but a more cartoony background might be more effective. And maybe driving through snow would better explain the incomplete wheels.

I like this..

hahah, this is really funny and cute! great idea with the colors and the window drawings!

?

ty ur comment Li3N, makes no sense to me either lol, but I like to look at it just the same

very abstract entry. GL!