I used downloaded brush which i download it year ago, see sbs for that brush. I hope this is okey!
because i can't find the URL of the brush
I made a video making of this entry i invite you all to see the video, just click the Source 4 below.
i apologize to modz that i use the source URL to link the video. i hope it is okey!
i don't think i break the rules here the video is still anonymous artist/account.
(5 years and 2702 days ago)
4 Sources:
- 1: Grass
- 2: Snake1
- 3: Snake2
- 4: The Making Video here
Blurry compared to source images.
yes, it is my intention to blur and smudge it a little to balance the whole image. the snake1 is the blurry one specially the head portion.
Lots of work here, author, nice outcome. Very interesting video sbs, and such a different way to mask.
i'm glad you notice the way i mask,
thank you so much pearlie!
Both source images are clear. I see no reason to blur them.
CMYK is right, if you want to give a realistic touch to your work....do not blur the source images.... good luck.
i made some changes.
yes! no reason to blur them, its clear enough.
as you can see the video i used duplicating the source images many times and blend as softlight to give more intense color as i think, but it also give more disturbing pixels as i see, that is why i smudge it a little the snake images and blur the edges. the grasses i also duplicate it and blur then blend to multiply and softlight. i think that way i balance the whole image.
i believe the final result image is still look good and not damage as a blurry one.
thank you so much for your comments both CMYK and George55
Howdie stranger!
If you want to rate this picture or participate in this contest, just:
LOGIN HERE or REGISTER FOR FREE