There's no reflection of the angel or the demon in the water on the floor...

@MossyB please see hi res and also see your monitor settings because it is a relection of the angel in water

There's nothing in your SBS, and the Hi-Res shows the window through a translucent portion of a stone statue. Since the angle is cool colored, the reflection would also be cool, not brown and not see-through.

Nothing showing any refraction or reflection of the light on the demon. The fuzzy glow you've added at the very bottom does not correspond with the window or the demon.

make it more "scary"... glowing red eyes, perhaps?

or maybe 'angelic' glow on the angel with cross?

reflection is too sharpen

A demon does not have a reflection imo, I see you changed the reflection of the Angel.
Might try blur it a bit. But it is your chop and good luck too you Author.

"A demon does not have a reflection, imo..."
It's vampires that supposedly don't have reflections...
And if that theorem holds true, then why would angels have a reflection? They're supposedly "ether and light..."
But since it is a "dream" should any of it have a reflection?

possibly yes and in a dream who knows? I just took the angel to be a statue as solid therefore reflection.
My dreams don't have time for reflections lol

@cabldawg71 and@MossyB please see final step of SBS

fine by me Author,

Her skin tones are very blotchy and strange - Her forehead looks almost green, while her jawline looks bruised...Makeup should even out the skin tones, not emphasize them.
You've also whitened her eyes and teeth a bit too much. Sometimes, less is more.

great use of source

cool idea GL

I just wonder about the model,....dont you think that she should be bit smaller or that flying thing in a higher position or ......aarggh.....maybe it is just my eyes that are wrong to see the compo,.......but one thing for sure it is great work,.....

I didnt think of that, the model, but yes I will try to make different adjustments this week on this, thanks dek !

looks A LOT like a book illustration!!! Kudos!!! author.. good luck

Good image. The tentacle behind the figure makes it very hard to judge the shadows but for sure the dark comma shaped shadow to the right of the figure on the ground needs to go. You're on your own for the rest.

Hey author, great work, my gf loves it.
Tentacles' shadow should be united with the main shadow which should be a perfect elipse. Because of the angle of the light you won't see the projection of the upper side.
Imo, it would add a great effect to make a shadow of the bubble as well, use this as reference:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2530/3676289691_7fd9418923_o.jpg

thanks guys,and greymval thanks for the advice!

interesting!

It definitely looks better, good job!
I don't wanna be pushy, but you should know that the shadow for a suspended object equals the length of an object when light source is above.
So the dark elipse should be same length as the ufo, and the light elipse same length as the diameter of the bubble ( which is an energy shield, right? ).

ooo,,,
you are right againnn I spend a lot just for these shadow

I love it. I love the concept, i love the execution and i love the title. Really well done author

Wild! GL!

Very cool surrealistic image!

Author, here's a good link on casting shadows.
http://www.photoshop-pack.com/details/Casting_Realistic_Shadows/11041
I know there are others, but I can't find 'em right now. Good luck!

Love the illustration look. I personally don't get the title.

Shadows continue to be a problem. The figure's shadow seems to be cast in a different direction than the UFO's. A line drawn from the center of the UFO's shadow through the center of the UFO itself doesn't continue on through the center of the light source. The tentacle shadows don't blend that smoothly into the UFO body's shadow.

With the strong back-light source, the front lighting of the UFO (and especially its underside and the tentacle connections) and the side/slightly-front lighting of the figure seem unnatural.

cmyk: thank you for the link , it was usefull !
dan: the title cames from buble , if you look at source 3, the sky is in the buble but I blend it at hard light mode and I losee the shape of the clouds, I think I will change this too
for the shadow you are right, but I know now what the problem was
the proble is the shadow of the girl in originaly source , I manipulate the photo ....but I didnt manipulate the shadow og the girl!
I think that if I wash out a little the shadow of the girl and with the right perspective for the other shadows that will be much better!I will try.
Thank you again all, I learn a lot from this entry and this is good!

Very very nice work author...i did not saw previous edition,but this one look very good...best of luck

Congrats on second !!

Congrats...so cool work...

Congrats for 2nd, nice

thank you!

Congrats!

I don't know if it's only with me, but I can't see anything clicking on source link...

oh u need an account, in order to see it.

Good attempt but the 'white' windows look wrong, shouldn't they be dark? Good Luck

nice work...gl

cool

not very vampirish

Would you like to improve the image? IMO, the first thing is adding a pair of fangs - as Tucker said, she's not very vampirish. I'd remove those "pimples" from her forehead, it's just distracting. And why using the texture? Vampires usually have a pale, but beautiful skin...

thanks for your post and will work on it

Looks more like Chucky's Bride than a vamp.

Um, reference the movie "Child's Play" if you are not familiar with Chucky.