Glad to see this back, but the shadow of the sign is still off. GL.

Great image! Tiny nitpick: try to replace the cut off whiskers. Good luck!

I can't decide if this is just too stupid, or too funny. I'll go with funny & hope that's what you intended.

Nice! Just one little nitpick: flesh tones on face are kinda choppy, but I'm lovin' this one!

Nice one...good grins!

Good mood.

Sorry author,looked like realism to me.

You left some white space between the branches. Why would a live tree be in the middle of a river?

Fun job! Not sure why the horse skeleton would still have ears, though...

Great imagination and execution!

Erikuri, amazing, isn't it?

Hehehehehe...WOO-HOO!

Good imagination...especially like the sails...GL!

Try to fix the white edges on the girl. The top of the boat wouldn't be visible in the reflection.

Fun image, but considering the angle of the light, the shadow would have to be almost round.

Just my 2 cents, but if there were only one butterfly (possibly a bit larger), it would give the image more of a focus. Good idea, though!

The camel at left should be bigger, and you've got 3 different light sources. The idea and color are good.

There were no hard hats in 4,000 BC or whenever the pyramids were made. Good idea, but not well thought out.

Sorry, not anonymous...pick one entry or the other.

Now all you have to do is remove the reflection...

Good work. The soft glow & shadows really make it. GL!

Would be much better without the reflection of the figures. Where's the bird?

Might have been good to remove the tattoos & lighten up the vignette...otherwise it's a nice image.

Not so great as everyone says. The light source is from behind, but lighting on the tree says light source from the right. The shadow of the tree should be behind and slightly to our left to conform to the light source. Please pay attention, author!

Good idea. Font not so good.

Good concept, but the lighting is off. Parts of the left area of the image are blown out, and there's no definative light source.

I think the POV would allow the balloon to reflect in the water, but that's just my opinion. However, I think the white boat wouldn't have such a dark reflection. Anyway, it's a good image.

Many different light sources, but good idea. Might have had more impact with a bit of color, but that's just my two cents. GL.

Interesting idea! Not sure if the artificial balloons add anything to the frog's ability to fly, though. GL.

Light source is from left. Rotate ball so shadow is at right.

Blur the edges.

Give the interior of the hand some dimension & this could be interesting...

Brilliant!

Excellent interpretation!

Congrats...nice job!

Congrats!

Good blend, but the colors don't really pop the flying lizards.
EDIT: On second look, light on lizards is from upper left corner, so where do the shadows come from? They'd be out of frame...

Good color, two different light sources.

There should be a defined edge to the left of the stone path. The light on the foreground buildings is from the right, on the middle building from the left.

SBS doesn't explain much. You have time to amend it.

Nicely done, but why eliminate the background in Step 4?

Left wing should be in front of clouds.

Now that I've seen the leopard source, kudos for removing all that grass from the figure. Higher vote from me now. My only nitpick is about the composition: if they could be moved to the right a bit it would work better IMHO. Good luck!

Good sense of drama in your image. You need a source link for the leopard.

Nice color. The turtle would have a bigger shadow, and maybe blur the rim lighting just a bit. Good luck!

Good work, and very funny expression!

Nice, except the type on the foreground biplane is backwards...

ROFL

Nicely done!

Great job!
"Silencio! Lo mato!"