- photo contests ▼
- photoshop contests ▼
- Tutorials ▼
- Social ▼Contact options
- Stats ▼Results and stats
- More ▼
- Help ▼Help and rules
- Login
Photography and photoshop contests
We are a community of people with
a passion for photography, graphics and art in general.
Every day new photoshop
and photography contests are posted to compete in. We also have one weekly drawing contest
and one weekly 3D contest!
Participation is 100% free!
Just
register and get
started!
Good luck!
© 2015 Pxleyes.com. All rights reserved.
Interesting how spinning rotors cast stationary shadows...
(5 years and 675 days ago)Really nice, but check the woman's shadow! (Probably wouldn't be much of one with a sky like that...). Holding vote.
(5 years and 675 days ago)Confusing lighting...the sky would seem to indicate the light source is not where the sun is.
(5 years and 675 days ago)Stars don't shine through the moon, and there are inconsistent light sources & perspective issues, but it's a good concept.
(5 years and 678 days ago)Good work.
(5 years and 679 days ago)Could just be a big rock...we can't see if it's floating or not.
(5 years and 680 days ago)Is she a giant, or is that a toy castle?
(5 years and 680 days ago)Author, the purpose of a Step-by-step guide is so you can show how your image was constructed.
(5 years and 687 days ago)Sources are copyrighted. Please see: http://www.pxleyes.com/blog/2009/06/how-and-where-to-find-legal-source-images/ and http://www.pxleyes.com/guidelines/photoshop/
(5 years and 693 days ago)UFOs are renders.
(5 years and 693 days ago)5.6. 3D Renders or Illustrations as Source:
Using other people's 3D renders or illustrations (even with permission and no matter in which form they are offered) creates a false impression of your artwork. So 3D renders or illustrations can not be used as sources, unless they are entirely created by yourself. Only acceptable non-illustration brushes and clip art may be used, but you need to mention them as a source too. Don't use an image that has been altered by the source owner nor an entire work created by someone else.
Please fix links 3 & 4.
(5 years and 696 days ago)Nice one!
(5 years and 714 days ago)Interesting idea & good blend. Might be better with a background.
(5 years and 740 days ago)You lost the blemishes, but you also lost most of the skin texture.
(5 years and 741 days ago)There's motion blur on the shuttle itself that tells the eye it's moving down, while the fuel tanks look like they're not moving at all.
(5 years and 743 days ago)Only one piece seems to be moving, and the wrong way, at that...
(5 years and 743 days ago)As I thought, source 3 is a render, and not useable. When using DA for source material, always use this link, which will take you to the stock section. http://www.deviantart.com/browse/all/resources/stockart/ Even then, some images will be renders or premade backgrounds, which are not valid sources. You have plenty of time to find a useable background and revise your entry.
(5 years and 743 days ago)Please fix links 2 and 3. They don't lead to images. The background looks like an illustration and wouldn't be useable in any case.
(5 years and 743 days ago)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VUb_6-XJWQ
(5 years and 748 days ago)Nice, but stars don't show through the moon...
(5 years and 757 days ago)Nicely done...good mood.
(5 years and 758 days ago)Just running an algorithm on an image isn't quite enough.
(5 years and 761 days ago)Agree about the shoulders, hair on her right side doesn't look natural. The edge is basically parallel to the building in background.
(5 years and 764 days ago)You might want to center the image, but that's just me...
(5 years and 771 days ago)Nice work, but what's with the edges?
(5 years and 778 days ago)More of a face exchange than a blend.
(5 years and 784 days ago)Please post your source links. See http://www.pxleyes.com/courses/guide/guide.pdf and http://www.pxleyes.com/blog/2009/06/how-and-where-to-find-legal-source-images/
(5 years and 791 days ago)I think this version works better.
(5 years and 793 days ago)The light source is almost overhead. I'd make the shadows lower and more to the right. I'd also make the reflection more visible.
(5 years and 793 days ago)Figure needs a reflection, shadows are wrong. Look at the shadow under the chin for original light source.
(5 years and 793 days ago)Not sure I like the torch, but the rest is good.
(5 years and 794 days ago)I think the lenses would still look like those in the source pic.
(5 years and 794 days ago)Rain should be more visible.
(5 years and 797 days ago)Definitely an improvement. (I do like the one with the tail, though).
(5 years and 798 days ago)Inconsistent shadows.
(5 years and 798 days ago)As I said, it's your preference. I thought a long low fin would look cool. Lots of the land speed record cars had fins. https://www.google.com/search?q=world+speed+record+cars&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwikhNrvw_3WAhUB5IMKHY56Ag4Q_AUICigB&biw=1724&bih=924
(5 years and 798 days ago)PS: I like the goofy guy in the back seat.
Very cool vehicle. I would have added a tail fin, but that's just my preference. It looks like there's a bit of red stuff to clean up under the rear of the fuselage.
(5 years and 799 days ago)Obviously hiding under the bed.
(5 years and 815 days ago)Good blend & mood over all, but the fish tail doesn't work for me.
(5 years and 820 days ago)Please link directly to your source images. You still need a link to the sky, and probably to the drip, unless you made it.
(5 years and 822 days ago)Owl and background sky are the same values. Makes it hard to see.
(5 years and 823 days ago)Good image...try to match the added shadows to those in the source pic.
(5 years and 824 days ago)