Author, please pay attention to light & shadow. It makes all the difference. You still have plenty of time to revise this. GL.

Nice blend! The man looks a bit big, but maybe that's just me...

Author, anything that makes your entries not anonymous is indeed your problem.

Aside from the fact that "A PXLEYES production" is vote pandering, it's really not bad, although the woman needs a shadow.

Author, your work is interesting, and technically good. The problem is, after we've seen the monochromatic stylizations, it is no longer anonymous.

Sorry to belabor the point, but the reflection is still wrong.

There shouldn't be an apostrophe in "artists". Also, the reflection should be proportional to the type above.

Great mood & color!

Hmmm...I can't decide if I think the stem needs a shadow, or a reflection...anyway, I like this!
Edit: Yep, the shadow works for me.

Good idea, but I'd adjust the perspective on the pieces.

It's a photo. You haven't designed a weird type of transport.

Good idea. Wrong reflection. Would be better with a realistic background.

Also, if you draw a line from the tip of his nose to our right, there's a bit of his face that's transparent. If you erased it the metal would blend better. Great idea and execution over all. GL author!

Very nicely done indeed!
(It's just missing some tracks in the sand...).

Members who suggest how your image could be better are doing you a favor. If you choose to be insulted by their comments, you had better be a genius who can afford to ignore them. In this case you are not.

Good imagination...the best of a bad lot.

Really nice idea! Now give it a realistic background and you'll get a high vote!
(At least fix the lame reflection that makes the bus look like it's levitating). If you make a SBS you'll do even better.

It's a nice image, but I don't see face painting here.

Is using prefab brushes face painting?

Very good idea, but Mossy is right, and the reflections could be a bit darker. Still, good work.

The light from the streetlight would still not continue behind the figure. That part would be in shadow.

On theme, but ho-hum.

Nice take on the imagery of the song!

Good colorizing on the head, although the figure kinda dies against the background...maybe create depth of field by blurring & slightly desaturating the background? Just a suggestion.

Not painted, just an overlay.

Good idea & smudge work...GL author!

I'd remove the bad shadow and make the cat stand out from the background. Otherwise, good idea.

Try finding some real wings.

Source link for the moon? Nice job here, but I'd rotate the moon clockwise to align it with the light source. GL author.

Interesting idea but it's pretty washed out.

Maybe give him some more space...the beak touching the edge is awkward.

A reflection isn't just a flip...you wouldn't see the upper parts of the porch roof & railing.

LOL...seat butts are always at the same height.

Very realistic...looks like he'd be hard to swat!

SBS?

Pops now, GL author!

Good idea, but you need to figure out how to distinguish the mostly dark figure from the mostly dark background...it would really pop then!

Good image, but SBS says nothing about how the leaves were created.

Very clever...GL author!

Good luck, and thanks for the chuckle!

The white specks on the swan are distracting, and clearly not there in the source pic. Othwerwise, not bad.

Good work.

Good image. Maybe illuminate the eye...?

Author, I have to say if I have to endure another floating island pic, this is one of the better ones. GL.

PS: It would be nice to see how you achieved the metallic effect on the shield. We're all here to learn.

I'm always a fan of stuff with dark chocolate. Not much of a peanut butter lover, though. I gotta say they look yummy except for the unnecessary colored sprinkles. Over all though, this is a superior entry.

OK might wanna change the title too...

The figure obviously has two legs. There is chain mail above the lion shield which comes from the waist, then covers a bit of left leg of the figure. If only the author had made a SBS this image wouldn't be so confusing.

Author, you can edit your image using the source provided without having it removed. There's plenty of time.