Sorry, I should have said waterline.

Where's the horizon line?

Congrats indeed...good chop.

Yep, ankle looks better. Sweet image.

Better version...GL author.

Beautiful! Good blend, and the little lizard on the hand is a great touch...just one thing: the ankle doesn't look right...maybe more human skin there. GL, author!

Great idea and mood! Just fix & smooth the jagged edges on the stone steps. GL.

This is an excellent entry, but I think I'd take Pingenvy's advice and re-do the ship. GL author!

No, just my preference. As I said, this is well done, I'd just like it more without the texture.

Make the moons round.

Low res looks good! In high res the texture doesn't work for me, but it's still well done. GL author.

Nice image. You could also try playing around with turning a grayscale image into a duotone or tritone to get even more tonal values. GL, author.

Good idea with a scale problem: TV's too small, goldfish too big.
(No source for TV).

SBS would make this better.

Dem smokes jes don't go dat way.

The red spiral thing is really distracting from your main focus.

Wow, that's some spitball! Nice job.

Nicely done.

Good blend & lighting! Small nitpick: the stripes could conform to the folds on the foreleg better.

Not exactly sure how this works as camouflage, but good effort.

Well done!

No matter how I look at your image and the source image, I can't see that you've used the smoke from the source image. Maybe you could expand the SBS and show that?

The ship wouldn't be transparent.

Good use of the source. GL.

Good idea, but you should have color matched all the rocks. The different color rocks just look like cut & paste this way. You also have conflicting light sources...not too late to correct this...GL.

What are the sources of the faces? If they are your pics please say so.

Nice take on the source!

Well done...very realistic!

There's still some hair on the left (his left) cheek, but over all this is a great job.
Edit: Cheek looks better now...GL

Author, here's a good link on casting shadows.
http://www.photoshop-pack.com/details/Casting_Realistic_Shadows/11041
I know there are others, but I can't find 'em right now. Good luck!

Yep, I knew there were...
(And no, iI don't think I'd care to know any bunnies, thanks...)

OK author, I need to word this very carefully...if those are your personal Barbies, and you posed them on your own personal bed for this photo, I would encourage you to immediately commit suicide. If however they belong to your daughter, all is forgiven and my fears for the future of humanity are assuaged. In any case, don't you think the image would be way funnier if Hef's pic was on the guy?
Anyway, thanks for making me laugh.

Dude, I love you. I think you get some of the best drugs on the planet! (Yeah, I know I've said that before). But I really do admire the way your mind works. You may not always get high votes on some of your images, but I think your imagination is superb. GL.

You need to post links for your sources. Author, this is really funny, but would be WAY better if you could plug Hef's face in there.

Very effective in its simplicity. GL author!

IMO the bottom cross is redundant and distracting, however, you've made a great image here nevertheless. GL author!

You sure did.

Post source links.

Good image. The tentacle behind the figure makes it very hard to judge the shadows but for sure the dark comma shaped shadow to the right of the figure on the ground needs to go. You're on your own for the rest.

Color would improve this immensely.

Bill Maher rocks, and so did your time lapse video! IMHO this could have done better.

Gee whiz, who knew they had cameras back then? Not sure if turning this into a snapshot on a desk helps or hurts, but GL author.

Light on foreground (star hut) is from right, light on middle ground (landscape) is from left, and your light source (sky) doesn't match either. Good idea, though...

Good job blending the girl into the field. GL author.

Great job! (Where are the other 2 legs?).

Actually even though the shadow is from the source, it should be extended.

Good idea, but I'd make the vertical face darker.

Great idea! Just 2 things: the stones should be thicker, and instead of faking it, you could have imported the grass edge from the foreground stone to the edges of the others.
(You still can...). GL author.

Why no SBS? Lack of even a simple SBS will lose votes.