Please post the link for the moon, and post your own uncut photos in a step-by-step guide.
From the guidelines: "You are allowed to use non-copyrighted photos. It is not allowed to use copyrighted photos, artwork and so on. It's not a shame to use a reference, but if you do you, must post this reference, either as a link or, if the photo is yours, you must post this photo uncut in the SBS."

Why would there be shadows on a dark day? (Oh yeah...surrealism, right?)
In that case, see above.

Snails aren't insects, but it's still a good image.

Didn't see the previous version, but this one's lookin' good!

Hands don't look like they're attached to the tree, and should have some bark texture. Good mood & color.

LOL...the LEFT shoe!

Mighty oversaturated.

This is nitpicking, but on the jeans beneath the man's eye, compare to the source image...there's some sort of irregularity there that looks like it's patched in. And at right of the left shoe, directly below the cuff, there's still a triangular piece of background that the arm of the star is pointing at.

Good idea, but edges need cleaning up, especially on the left leg. Part of the background is still there between the jeans & shoe on the right side, and there's some sort of patch beneath the man's eye.

Black on black on black...try lightening the background.

Good idea, but a bit too desaturated.

More shading! (And try to get rid of the girl's outline...).

Good transformation of the source, good mood & color.

Good blend.

Great color & composition!

Love this...great blend, color & composition!

There's no bark here, just wood.

Perspective problem. Source pic is shot at a different angle than the steps. The cup is also at a different angle, and is cut off flat at the base.

Love the eye. Busy background distracts from the frog.

Nice critter! IMO the tail should move to our right a bit, though.

Figures are too dark & almost invisible...shouldn't have been difficult to find another source, or a lighter background.

Perspective problem. The foot in the source pic is shot at eye height, but in your image it's much lower. Good mood as usual, author.

Nice whimsy here.

You should have done something with the crocodile's tail.

What everyone else said!

Conflicting light sources. Also, the dark treelike thing wouldn't have a light colored reflection.

SBS? Looks like you're missing some rib cage reference...

Would love to see SBS.

Not exactly sure what I'm looking at here, but I like the imagination that went into it.

Author, I guess you know I'm not a fan of pre-made brushes, but just to clarify...I'm a sucker for a good Alice in Wonderland pic, and this IS a good one!

Great image! (And I'm SO glad the sparkle brushes are inconspicuous...).

Light source on girl is opposite lighting on hand & slide.

I reiterate my previous comment about members with fewer entries having an advantage. Now we have an entrant with only 5 previous entries.

Ummm...I don't see a nose horn.

Not sure about the anatomy, but it sure is intricate.

Not bad, but edges of horse are too sharp & head needs a reflection.

Good concept. If you make this symmetrical it will be a mandala.

You just used the grass?

LOL...improve the image...add another wing! (It's a pretty sucky source, at least as far as the single wing goes).

Author, are you really content to just leave it that way?

The wings need a lot of work.
(Actually right now there's only one wing...).

Good blend, just smooth edges on the horse.

Nice, but resolution of mushroom is too low for the rest of the image.

Not sure about the wing distortion, but it's a good fun image!

You don't need the drop shadow against the background.

There should be some dirt showing on the edge of the grass cross section. Otherwise this is a great idea and good execution!

Looks like a mandala to me...nice organic looking one, too...GL author!

Author, your source is not usable. Please read http://www.pxleyes.com/blog/2009/06/how-and-where-to-find-legal-source-images/ to find usable images