- photo contests ▼
- photoshop contests ▼
- Tutorials ▼
- Social ▼Contact options
- Stats ▼Results and stats
- More ▼
- Help ▼Help and rules
- Login
Photography and photoshop contests
We are a community of people with
a passion for photography, graphics and art in general.
Every day new photoshop
and photography contests are posted to compete in. We also have one weekly drawing contest
and one weekly 3D contest!
Participation is 100% free!
Just
register and get
started!
Good luck!
© 2015 Pxleyes.com. All rights reserved.
I tried to help you. No need to come at me like that.
(5 years and 494 days ago)Us Photoshoppers can see imperfections in an instant. We also have Photographers on this site who have just as good, or better, eyes than we do, and they too may be judging your art. The contest calls for an image up to 3500 X 3500 so you may as well take advantage of that. Your image is 1500 X 1000 and will have to be scaled UP in order accommodate even the lowest resolution desktop monitor they sell today - which is 1920 X 1080. This scaling by itself will add noise, blur, etc, and make the image look worse. In other words, when "we" (the judges) look at it, we are seeing it all messed up looking. In these contest people don't know or care about the reasons you may be using to make your images smaller. We just look at it and determine how well it looks to us.
(5 years and 494 days ago)While you did fix a great deal of noise, there still is "copious" amounts of it left. You did lessen the yucky fringing on the legs, by a lot, but it is still "glaringly" obvious. Now trust me, I am not getting critical here at all. These things that I am pointing out are very obvious. I can and do get very critical when critiquing images, but that is not what I am doing now. These things are still very recognizable, distinct, evident, and clear as a bell.
https://image.ibb.co/eyeuHe/yucky_statue.jpg
There is some real bad white fringing on the far right leg and some on top of the other, probably from a poor cut out. Those blown out highlight areas on the legs are real bad. There is also a ton or jpg atficats everywhere. Very apparent in the clouds, around the shoes, legs, and lighthouse. I don't know why you made this so small or what jpg setting you used, but you need to crank it up a whole lot more.
(5 years and 495 days ago)I am not going to red flag it. The mods will eventually decide if a toy qualifies as a statue/sculpture or not. In my opinion all toys qualify as statues though. Dolls are just mini 3D statues or models of people, animals or cartoons.
(5 years and 496 days ago)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doll
I just thought the contest idea was more along this line.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCwcKEUcqcU&t=245s
Where is the sculpture that you created? You have done nothing to the source images except cut out and resize the chocolate and paste it on top of the other.
(5 years and 497 days ago)Your masha is already a statue. We are not allowed to use sources which are already sculptures or statues. The idea is to make one out of something which is not a sculpture or stature.
(5 years and 497 days ago)Congrats on 1 and 2 Ernest
(5 years and 498 days ago)Well done how you got the chopper in so clear like it belonged there. REalistic.
(5 years and 500 days ago)Love this one... the dark outline works well in this way..
(5 years and 500 days ago)Just came over to this side to have a peek....HOLY GUACAMOLE this caused a shiver to run down my spine. Loved it.
(5 years and 502 days ago)Love your statue.. but the backgroud is not art
(5 years and 503 days ago)I think you deserve a congrats.... not a bad image....
(5 years and 505 days ago)Congratulations on 3rd and 4th place Ernest.
(5 years and 505 days ago)Nice 3rd DS!!
(5 years and 505 days ago)I will try to remember this because forever I have problems cutting out hair. Thank you.
(5 years and 507 days ago)Members like Skyangel and BWR frighten the beegeebees outta me, their work is stellar and I just "fave" their pieces, study them, sometimes write to them to get more in depth responses, which they always give. Slowly, some day ! Thank you for your encouragement.
(5 years and 507 days ago)Channel masking and Calculations can save time. It makes "hard" cut outs like this lightning very easy to do. This technique is also good for hair, feathers, and many other irregular things.
(5 years and 507 days ago)@ still26, join the fun. The only way to learn is to do. Come join us.
(5 years and 507 days ago)Your escape from misery adds to my misery recognizing how limited I am in creativity when it comes to chop and paste and manipulate as you have done. I come to this side of the site and get stimulated, inspired and encouraged and your work has done that for me....so thank you....
(5 years and 508 days ago)YOU DREW THIS !?! Did you use a WACOM tablet. I would not have minded to see a bit more detail of background as the clipping (block ups) detracts and could be used as a great "backup singers" tool. There appears to be some incongruity around the tail. You have the shadow down pat, but parts look pasted on. The colour palette used gives a cool feel.
(5 years and 508 days ago)What a grand idea to put this up in monochrome for it gives us a sneaky feel of the robot beneath. The blending looks well done here and not pasted on.
(5 years and 508 days ago)The comments given to you above are a goldmine of information, not only for you but to those of us struggling. I love your idea, it is truly creative...just needs polishing up.
(5 years and 508 days ago)ha ha ha ha....I just got the title! What a great imagination you have on all levels. The patch that is lifted throws me off , feels unbalanced a bit as it gets too much attention and not the robotic part...but that is just me.
(5 years and 508 days ago)This reminds me of the BORG from Star Trek (the episode with HUGH). I find the nose a tad of a distraction as it is not in focus. Woof!
(5 years and 508 days ago)I like the name. He isn't a K-9, he is a K-9000.
(5 years and 511 days ago)You can extract that lightening very nicely with "Calculations" set to "Grey + Gray and Multiply". I don't have a mic but I made a video for you to show you how to do this lightning VERY VERY quickly and very decently. Mind you, this is a good extraction, but there is more to it if you want to get it better. You will have to research this more if you want to get into absolute perfection, but what I showed you in the video is very fast and mostly good enough. I advice you to research Calculations (as well as Channel Masking). It is an extremely powerful tool!!
(5 years and 512 days ago)https://youtu.be/9In0YM67gyQ
Also there are "hair/grass" brushes in Photoshop. I think they are #133 and #134 or there abouts. You can use them to mask in the cat's antennae rather than just putting a black dot over them. Hope this all helps.
Viva la com·mer·cial·ism.
(5 years and 515 days ago)Where did those "5 " plates come from?... Am i missing something?
(5 years and 521 days ago)Nice 2nd Drivenslush
(5 years and 525 days ago)Optically delusional.
(5 years and 528 days ago)Very interesting..
(5 years and 528 days ago)Hello, I'm writing to you from Thailand, not Bangkok but close (Chiang Mai). I love the chop of this upload. Please have a look on her R shoulder. See that? There is a spot you missed, you might want to fix it before the Photoshoppe Police spot it! Top of the shelf work.
(5 years and 532 days ago)Very well done. But maybe you should put this picture in the SBS section and present the square in a frame or as it is (to make it prettier) in the contest part.
(5 years and 536 days ago)The edges of that hole are kinda sharp.
(5 years and 539 days ago)Some motion blur might help.
(5 years and 539 days ago)Cool idea, I think it would look even cooler if you worked the base of those "ring worms" some. Maybe some shadow/grounding work; or make it look like they were coming out of the ground texture.
(5 years and 542 days ago)This is cool....
(5 years and 543 days ago)Very very original ! love it good luck author !
(5 years and 548 days ago)Rude concept, but good. Check the glare on the "shroom head" though.
(5 years and 549 days ago)so cute
(5 years and 552 days ago)I expected a better result for this cute one.... !
(5 years and 554 days ago)This is insane, I love it!
(5 years and 554 days ago)You might make it more alive if you make the water line (above > underwater) a little less rigid.
(5 years and 556 days ago)very cool !
(5 years and 556 days ago)Looks like you had a lot of fun warping. It is time consuming work. Did you feel like you were in a time warp?
(5 years and 557 days ago)Nice work. The background perhaps could stand a little blur and shadow/highlight adjustment IMHO. Nice concept!
(5 years and 557 days ago)I love her!!!
(5 years and 560 days ago)thanks
(5 years and 561 days ago)Please post your additional sources
(5 years and 561 days ago)congrats ds
(5 years and 561 days ago)