A bit too generic. Change the lettering, and it could be a tribute to any actor. It would have been nice to see something to help connect it visually to Clint. Maybe a Magnum or a .44 bullet. Something...

Too dark overall, and the light striking the foot doesn't match the "setting sun" effect BEHIND the mountains...
Nice work on the bigfoot, but it can't be fully appreciated when it's just dark and muddled looking.

Good job, but too dark, especially the bottom RH corner.

The eye whites are still too bright white. But the skin coloring is very good.

The edges of the arms have a bluish cast, and her legs are a noticeably different color from the rest of her body.

Whether or not you meant the play on words, the image shows the spheres in front with reflections that resemble little faces on them, that look very cute, so yes, they ARE "attractive spheres!"

Really nice work, good job!

Good overall composition, the eye is nicely led across the painting.

Your biggest problem is one of being consistent in your painting.
The tree trunks suddenly get very thin from thick, and you over did the above ground roots a bit too much.
Your coloring is also inconsistent. This is most noticeable in the sky. Generally, the sky is slighly darker at the top, getting a little lighter as you get nearer the earth. Your sky has like a "light colored halo" around the picture.
This brings up the biggest consistency problem, the water reflection. Your sky is darker and bluer, with clouds that the sky doesn't show, while your trees are LIGHTER in the water reflection. .

You also have the edges of the water a bit too perfect, more like a swimming pool or a puddle after a rain. If you study some photos of landscapes, you will see that nature is seldom quite so regularly shaped and spaced.

Here is an example to show you - Notice the coloring of the sky and the trees, and along the edges of the water:
http://www.sxc.hu/photo/1076964

It's a good start, you will get better the more you practice.

Different and creative, but too dark. It's hard to appreciate the bottom half of the image, because the values are too low key.

Very nice composition, but the tree branches are too symmetrical on the left, like the teeth on a comb. You need to paint some branches in the middle of the tree facing the viewer. Branches need to overlap and grow from different directions, not just the sides.

Here is a tutorial about painting pine trees you may find helpful:
http://watercolorworksart.blogspot.com/2008/03/painting-pine-tree.html

Too dark and not enough contrast. It's hard to make out the background, or the top of the creature.

Her ears are at different heights, but you got the cheekbones and lips pretty good.

The fishbowl is at a weird perspective angle compared to the rest of the image, the table, the boy, etc. It looks like is it tilted up towards the viewer.

The large grass in front makes the size proportion look wonky. They look like toy soldiers.

Very nice work, but it needs some sort of perch. No background or perch makes it look like it's floating, or standing on tip-toe.

Too dark, too low contrast on the sign and the liquid. The glasses look empty and the sign looks like an almost blank plaque.

Really nice colors and visual texture. Good job!

The "fire" looks like yellowed fungus, And the all black background makes it look like a bad cut out.

Add some (a lot) more reds, oranges, and sparingly add some very bright yellow to white accents to make the flames look more like fire, and put the figure somewhere, either in the middle of a campfire, or a stage, something to create a scene, as opposed to a thing.

Very creative and attractive. Well done!

Great modeling, but the chocolate is too grayed out. The tabletop and background behind the tiles look more chocolate-y than the chocolates.

Too dark, and the bottom of the window is crooked.

Too dark. Could be snowmen, could be martians. Too hard to tell...

The paper swan is lit from the opposite side of the real one (look at the shadow beneath the real swan's neck).

With the sun setting behind Stonehenge, the knight should not be showing a bright reflection from the other side...Inconsistent lighting.

The snow man shows no shadow on his body, although he shows a shadow on the floor. That makes him look very flat and artificial.
Likewise, the two "snowy lumps" are casting no shadows on the floor.

Otherwise, this is very nicely done!

The white cloudy looking spot inside the clock is the only distraction. Otherwise, this is exquisite!

The flipped swan and the bubbles are lit from the opposite side of the woman holding the swan. Light source consistency is always important. The bubbles make no real sense, and you've positioned them so that it looks like the flying swan is pooping... ?

The mirror effect is poorly executed, there is a very noticeable "dip" at the center. You might try the Clone tool to make it a bit more even with both sides.

Where are her legs?

The lighting of the eagles is poor. With that bright a sun behind them, they should show some backlighting and more illumination from beneath. But they all show strong lighting from on top...

Too chaotic, with no clear focal point to the composition. The white outline around the girl doesn't contribute to anything, smoke, fire, or visual believability. Interesting concept, but too much going on, with no clear direction.

Umbrellas usually are held in the direction the rain is falling...Maybe reverse the rain so the umbrella is doing some good?

Pretty, but too green overall. The tree trunks, particularly.

The light source is opposite the background, you should flip the grenade to make it consistent...

Really nice, but her legs look green with the shadows...If you can make all of her warm toned, it will be better.

Too dark. Some background or ambient lighting might help.

Some additional color might help this. It's a bit too yellowy to really say "Christmas..."

Really clean work. I like the muscle definition that is visible within the flames. Good job!

Great work!

Her hair is too fluffy for being in a downpour like that...

Too dark. There is little to no depth, just images on a black background.

The background of the snowglobe is pitch black...Even distorted, some of all the ambient lighting from the tree lights should be visible.

That said, this is a very well done image.

Too dark, especially the bottom. You could crop an inch of the dark off the bottom of the image and not have it affect your composition at all...

Great concept, nice chop, but too dark at the bottom. You can't even see Alice's feet...

Too dark in the lower LH corner.

Really well drawn!

Jawshoewhah, you are MORE than welcome to disagree, but do not insult me, or any other members you disagree with. It only makes you look immature...

Too dark, it's hard to see the entire creature, making it look flat.

A bit too dark, but a great drawing!

The cows needed shadows to match the rest of the scene.

A bit too much "negative space." This would have looked better with some judicious cropping of the sides. Good composition and concept, though!