The streaks don't much resemble "tears," but an interesting composition, none the less. Nice colors.

The top part looks very flat and oddly proportioned. It doesn't really look like a "real" dress, more like a paper cut out.

Just too dark in overall gamma. Cannot clearly make out the castle, while the foliage is a bit too light.

Her thumb looks really misshappen at the end, but great color matching on the umbrella.

The drost effect is a bit trite and overworked as a concept, but your execution is very good!

Still too sharp edged in the front, making it look cut and paste with a bad distortion. The dark edge is part of the problem. Very creative idea, though!

Too dark. You can barely make out the source image, or much of anything else.

Too yellow. The sepia effect does not help the image, since it is "rainy..."

Lovely, but too yellow; makes it bileous looking

The lighting on the man is inconsistent with the lighting on the tank, and the man is too dark.

If the light bulb and the car headlights are reflected on the table surface, the letters should be also...

Too desaturated.

It would be more effective if you showed the thorns, or a bunch of nails, or broken glass. Something to display why the sign is literal. The grass doesn't look very "threatening..."

Nice composition, but the yellow-green sky is too dominant and distracting.

Very nice contrast, movement, and lighting. Well done.

Too dull with no color. Agree with CMYK. It's so chopped beyond recognition, you could have used anything to make the image. Not a good use of the source image.

Too dark on the man below the shoulders. Especially since the helmets of the shoulders show a light source coming from behind the man, not on top...

If the car window is showing the stained glass as a reflection, the car body should be showing it as well, especially the roof, and to a lesser extent, the trunk.

Similarly, the hood of the car the viewer is "inside of," should likewise show some reflection of the stained glass.

The back window looks like a tv screen, broadcasting the image.

The lighting is inconsistent. There are shadows on the bird, but none on the woman, and the umbrella shows no real lighting at all.

If it is a round rubber ball shaped creature, why do you only show it squashed?
If you are attempting to illustrate it "animated," it would only be squashed in contact with the ground. It would be ball shaped at the peak of the bouncing arc, and elongated while moving...
Since the one on the right evidently has its horn stuck into the cave roof, it is in essence, not moving at all, and so should be spherical.

The eyeballs under the lids looks misshapen and oval.

The shading on the eyes does not match the shading under its eyes...
Also, with all that explanation about the eggs, you should illustrate some of the eggs around it, as well as how it "forces" the eggs away...Projection laying? Nudging? Spitting them away?

Nice job with lighting consistency!

A bit too dark and desaturated. It looks somewhat dull, particularly the bananas.

You have light sources coming from both sides of your image, which would work from a surrrealistic standpoint, but the woman is then illuminated from beneath, which is just to visually inconsistent for a successful image.

Beautiful creation, but your overall gamma is too dark, making so much of your effort hard to appreciate.
Just using a lighter background would do wonders, or adding a spotlight...Something to bring up the contrast between your award and the background would do wonders.

Too dark, particularly on the LH side.

The background is too dark. It makes the mushrooms look like they are floating in the darkness, rather than being in shadow. I'd suggest bringing up the ambient light a bit.

There is a section just below the center where the animals are cropped ~ Top of the elephant's head, a purple bird's wing, along with bits and pieces of other animals. There's also a turquoise elephant near the bottom, with the left side of his head missing...

Other than that, it is a very creative piece.

It's too dark. All you can see is a dark face.

The dry hair in a pouring rain looks a bit weird...

The cats have light colored pixels showing, and the light shining on the grayish cat doesn't match anything else in your scene, same with the light reflection on the caterpillars. Inconsistent lighting is a vote killer for a lot of members...

Nice image, the but "nuclear glow" mouth is a bit distracting...

Too dark. It's hard to make out what the baby is being protected from, and the creatures look like they are free floating, and are not grounded at all.

Too dark. The tree house looks like its suspended in front of the tree, because you can't make out the back very well. The source lighting just doesn't make sense with such a dark environment. If the "sun" is setting, there would be more contrast, with a more defined light source direction. The light source appears to be almost suspended facing the tree house, which is too high for a sunset. If the "sun" is peeking through the dark clouds, there would be more ambient light.

This one is so CBR'd, I can't make out the source image at all..

Too dark, and the edges around the bunnies show too many stray pixels and are too sharp, giving them a definite "'cut and paste" effect.

The reflections on the cherries show dark spots, which looks weird.

The chin is too small. It's like he has no jaw.

Really good balance and movement. Well done!

This is lovely to look at, but you have a few really obvious perspective issues. The dress ends on the steps above the urn on the right, but the dress is in FRONT of the base of the urn...Also the squishing of the frontmost urn at the bottom looks inconsistent and out of place with the rest of the image.

And the seagulls just look contrived, as they really don't belong in the scene...

If you can't distinguish that the horse has two legs in the back, it has nothing to do with it being "evil," it has to do with it being too dark...

You also need to adjust your horizon. the ocean shows a definite tilt down to the left...

So fix it!

Very well done, author! The values provide great depth and dimensionality.

The lighting is wonky. The ship is lit from the upper back, while the helmet shows an upper front light source, and the sponge man under the helmet shows no real light source at all on his shoulders... The shadow of the spaceship should be more to the right, and the base of the ship needs to show highlights more than reflections, particularly the LH side.
The duplication of the sponge spacemen is also too obvious, with the poses too similar, with the lighting problems at the base of the ship emphasized by the "cookie cutter" spongeman placement.

Really great concept. The only thing bothering my eye are the bases. They are too blurry and the dark sections at the base throw off the illusion.

Your wings need to be consistent in size. On both figures, the wings on the left are larger than the wings on the right...

Disturbing, but very creative! The jaw is too warped and the LH side of the "flames" is a bit too high contrast, fighting the image for dominance, but the overall concept is wonderful.

Colorful, but the left foot is wonky and the overall image doesn't show a lot of spatial depth. It's cartoon colorful, but flat.

It's too blurry, and the tower is crooked, leaning to the right.