- photo contests ▼
- photoshop contests ▼
- Tutorials ▼
- Social ▼Contact options
- Stats ▼Results and stats
- More ▼
- Help ▼Help and rules
- Login
Photography and photoshop contests
We are a community of people with
a passion for photography, graphics and art in general.
Every day new photoshop
and photography contests are posted to compete in. We also have one weekly drawing contest
and one weekly 3D contest!
Participation is 100% free!
Just
register and get
started!
Good luck!
© 2015 Pxleyes.com. All rights reserved.
Isn't there a swimming area to the right?
(5 years and 3346 days ago)Please could we have a high res, I'd love to see it in all its' beauty.
(5 years and 3346 days ago)lovely, I bet she liked it too.
(5 years and 3346 days ago)Fantastic!!!
(5 years and 3346 days ago)Exremely awesome my friend! very well done! best of luck to ya!
(5 years and 3347 days ago)Absolutely gorgeous! very well done!
(5 years and 3347 days ago)cool
(5 years and 3347 days ago)I know that bridge!!
(5 years and 3347 days ago)This is quite nice!
(5 years and 3347 days ago)I think that Ade and Friiskiwi mean that the authors other entry is the following lines from the rhyme "Girl are made Sugar and spice and all things nice" but unless you know the ryhme you wouldn't know anyway
(5 years and 3347 days ago)Some seem to be under the impression that using "film" is an excuse for photos that aren't sharp. You can have a film shot have grain for artistic purposes (you can do that with digital too - we just call it "noise", but, you can also have crystal clear shots on film as well. You simply need to use the appropriate ISO for the lighting conditions. I could be wrong, but I think this is a digital photo (look around the hat rim or the dark areas in the arch). Probably a small area that was cropped from a much larger shot. Enlargement like that can cause this type of pixilization. Or, maybe it was film - with just too much inconsistent grain
(5 years and 3348 days ago)kind of looks like a mob hit they didn't have time to finish hiding. (j/k nice shot)
(5 years and 3348 days ago)I had that idea author. IMO, the most important thing about photos is to have the capaoity...ooops, the talent to "see" reality in a different way from the others. You do this very well.
(5 years and 3348 days ago)very cute! congrats my friend!!
(5 years and 3348 days ago)This shows very much expression! i love this well done
(5 years and 3349 days ago)I think he/she may have used a film camera or maybe it was sharpened too overall nice shot though
(5 years and 3349 days ago)Oh my! haha this is a great picture...you did "shoot" her for sure
(5 years and 3349 days ago)Beautiful! very nice shot! GL author!
(5 years and 3349 days ago)This is very nice and i think i can guess who it is love this
(5 years and 3349 days ago)oh, don't say that, author, I think we have all been pushed to (strict) rules by Joshua. Yet I think you should be more worried if he does NOT make any remark to your shots than if he does.
(5 years and 3349 days ago)This is on the street? With a white background? It's too bad you couldn't get a sidewalk or other people in the background passing. It's just hard to tell he's out on a street.
(5 years and 3349 days ago)lovely
(5 years and 3349 days ago)great view!
(5 years and 3349 days ago)Frogs and snails and puppy-dogs' tails...great shot!
(5 years and 3349 days ago)I think this would look a lot better if you removed that black spec under her eye that just looks like dirt. Trust me, healing brush is your friend. It's a really nice image but I think it would make all the difference in the world if you just attended to the small scratches with healing brush.
(5 years and 3350 days ago)As far as what the other two comments are referring to, I'm lost too.
It's an awesome photo but please fix the scratches. It would really make a world of difference to your entry if you used healing brush to remove them. It is the only thing that distracts from the image. However, noise level works in this image so GL!
(5 years and 3350 days ago)Beautiful colours and very clear movement in this shot.
(5 years and 3350 days ago)Brides must be a favourite topic for you... And they are all beautiful (and your shots also)
(5 years and 3350 days ago)congzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz yet again
(5 years and 3350 days ago)CONGOOOOOOZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
(5 years and 3350 days ago)effective I like it
(5 years and 3350 days ago)Definitely much better, is it the same shot? or did you have more?
(5 years and 3350 days ago)CONGRATS Jenna!!! Well deserved 1st and 2nd place
(5 years and 3350 days ago)congrats....again
(5 years and 3351 days ago)hearty Congos on ur win!!!
(5 years and 3351 days ago)This looks like it may have been sharpened a little too much. A high res would be good
(5 years and 3351 days ago)Days like this I'm glad I'm single
(5 years and 3351 days ago)This time you probably could have done with less noise. But that's just IMO. However, aside from the grain, it's an excellent subject matter, well portrayed so GL!
(5 years and 3351 days ago)I think all mother in law's are related to each other..............
(5 years and 3351 days ago)much better.....
(5 years and 3351 days ago)Grain is fine. GL!
(5 years and 3351 days ago)It works this time, GL!
(5 years and 3351 days ago)i wouldn't say she looks as if she despises you...its more like she is saying to herself,
(5 years and 3352 days ago)"that useless @#$%^&*! what is he fiddling with that camera for?"
lol!
Very cool ))
(5 years and 3352 days ago)Great shot! The film does give it a nice look
(5 years and 3352 days ago)This is such an amazing shot! i love this! very nice job author! GL!
(5 years and 3352 days ago)It was pretty clear to me what Ade was talking about, perhaps if you hadn't uploaded the photos at the same time, it wouldn't be so obvious.
(5 years and 3352 days ago)what is it with some people!.......... I made a statement "I am guessing it is on film too". there was no criticism, just an observation, no more. there was no need for the aggressive reply. I like the shot, it has a story to tell, and as I am one who used to shoot film until quite recently, I thought I recognised the finish and made the comment.
(5 years and 3352 days ago)sorry, but the 'blob' in the centre ruins this shot.
(5 years and 3352 days ago)I would have asked the same thing---this picture is still beautiful! The way you react author, almost gives away who you are. Chill out about anyone asking if it is film all the time.
(5 years and 3352 days ago)I know two ladies that will absolutely NOT go to a wedding with only digital. They take their film all the time because there is a certain type of beauty in film still that a digital can't always capture.