Author none of source2s manipulated images say how they have been created so that doesn't prove anything. I do think it is manipulated image. I guess the only way to find out is to ask the author of the image. Aside from that its a nice image with a title that i would not have chosen, but that's your call its your work.

Some nice work. They seem a little busy and the pxleyes logo is a little lost on some especially against the background.

A banner is advertising, for example your 3d banner shows the pxleyes logo as the smallest object that is there the 3d stands out more than anything. I would make the 3d logo smaller and the pxleyes a little larger and also easier to see. I would prob also put the logo at the other side.

I do like the concept but feel it needs a little more work

Great concept

Real filter a think author

It ends so isn't it incorrect for the effect.

Bit of an unko pose

Don't take this personally, i congratulate you on placing second with a photo that is off theme. well done

"only the type we use to keep our electronics and toys working. Small is OK but nothing bigger than an Iphone"

Why bother with guidelines mods.

Great stuff

Really nice work with the source and final image.

The chain doesn't work for me.

Very cool abstract...gotta high res

Nice image, if you have used a gradient fill on the bgd you may want to replace it as gradient fills are not allowed.

Awesome bike..It appears to be floating is my only nitpick

Haha..i will pass on your transportation thanks..it may hurt.

Agree with above...Yep would look good on a leaf

Great stuff..though he looks to be drooling at the half clothed nymph we cannot see rather than greedy

LOL. I can see the bubble. Yes your work needs a little work author, and Mossy's comments are here to help you. (as are every one elses)

Though she(are you a she Mossy, LOL) tends to sound like a robot, very impersonal, but as greymval said she has no avatar and doesn't use smileys, i would if i knew how

Don't take it to heart.

Keep up the good work, we can only learn from our mistakes and sometimes others guidance.

Great shot

Nice..Needs a little tidying up of the hair by the heart, in high res looks as she has stubble.

Congrats

NIce shot but wheres the yellow

Is that yellow?

Nice

Well done

I meant on the left there is one spot that stands out

MMMM pudding

Love it, the only annoying thing is the dark spot to the right. Is it on the background or your sensor/lens?

Nice one

Great

Nice, love the colour as well

I like, but ti can see stems and leaves in the background

Nice, i would have had the flower at the other side.

Awesome

Nice..dont like the background colour.

Nice work, perspective is a bit out on the tray.

Nice win..great image

Congrats but i have to say that you have not really portrayed the work of a "famous" artist. I find the entry irrelevant to the comp.

I have no idea who you are trying to portray here author

This is a teddy dog not a teddy bear

Great work author. I feel your use of outlines has not worked in places. You have a dark outline ending at the hair., and lines elsewhere.that just don't work with the image.IMHO.

Amazing...great work

Nice image, i would sleep in that LOL

You need a ladder to go to bed

Like it

Your exactly right author. Keep at it. With wings you need to multi layer, especially for translucency. Both mossy and sgc have some helpful pointers. GL

Not even similar in style which i think is what it is meant to be.

Nice shot. I would crop the left and a little from the top. Stop the image from being so centered.

Nice job

If only dali had access to a comp and some graphics software. Nice work

Really nice, well done