- photo contests ▼
- photoshop contests ▼
- Tutorials ▼
- Social ▼Contact options
- Stats ▼Results and stats
- More ▼
- Help ▼Help and rules
- Login
Photography and photoshop contests
We are a community of people with
a passion for photography, graphics and art in general.
Every day new photoshop
and photography contests are posted to compete in. We also have one weekly drawing contest
and one weekly 3D contest!
Participation is 100% free!
Just
register and get
started!
Good luck!
© 2015 Pxleyes.com. All rights reserved.
Awesome!!!!
(5 years and 3391 days ago)Nice perspective
(5 years and 3398 days ago)Ohm how did I know
(5 years and 3398 days ago)beautiful
(5 years and 3399 days ago)I love rubber ducks
(5 years and 3401 days ago)Congrats!!
(5 years and 3403 days ago)Congrats...
(5 years and 3403 days ago)Congrats...
(5 years and 3403 days ago)Definitely well deserved.
(5 years and 3404 days ago)I'm so glad this placed so high. Well done my friend, as always!
(5 years and 3404 days ago)Congrats!
(5 years and 3404 days ago)And congrats again for a great third place!
(5 years and 3404 days ago)Congrats for your first place!
(5 years and 3404 days ago)And also congrats for your third place!
(5 years and 3404 days ago)Congrats for your second place!
(5 years and 3404 days ago)Glockman, seriously DO NOT AGREE. I guess you just don't get the fetish. (the Tie, the Hat) Just because of those two items and for the way it is posed. The fact you can't see her eyes also adds to the mystery and it's done just on the edge of censorship. It's the hat and tie that are a man's. A lot of men find women who dress up in men's clothes, especially there own, find it really arousing, and definite eye candy! I can recall Playboy doing spreads with the same idea.
(5 years and 3404 days ago)Oh, I'm sure if my mother was a member, she'd flag it. She's such a prude...
(5 years and 3404 days ago)Excellent shot... Glockman I'm curious if this is "not really that sexy" then what is?
(5 years and 3405 days ago)I thought you were just born with magic or something. ANY of us can learn it from a book?! *gasp*
(5 years and 3405 days ago)She looks fantastic for just having had a baby (I think I recognize that little smile). Or, If I'm wrong, she just looks fantastic. Congrats
(5 years and 3405 days ago)Yes, there's no way you can fool us: your shots can be recognized at first sight!
(5 years and 3405 days ago)This is well posed and the lighting is very well done, the lady has a great bod for sure,but in my opinion this is good artistic photograpy but really not that sexy. nice shot.
(5 years and 3405 days ago)very cool shot...gl
(5 years and 3405 days ago)wow...very cool...gl
(5 years and 3405 days ago)wow...very cool...gl
(5 years and 3405 days ago)Photo goddess...very well done author
(5 years and 3405 days ago)Fabulous shot...best of luck
(5 years and 3405 days ago)This is for sure eye candy...well done author
(5 years and 3405 days ago)mmm, I wonder who's this might be...................stunning shot, well framed, lit, everything, well done author.
(5 years and 3405 days ago)This image is well within the guides and rules....there is nothing offensive here.
(5 years and 3405 days ago)I already knew before I voted. But something tells me it had to be done
(5 years and 3405 days ago)Clever idea, author. GL!
(5 years and 3405 days ago)Good one - nice lighting . Probably a little nit picky but I'm just not sure about the pose - it looks a little like someone is twisting her arms behind her back
(5 years and 3405 days ago)Nicely done! 2 thumbs up!
(5 years and 3406 days ago)Well Done author!
(5 years and 3406 days ago)WOW! That's hot!
(5 years and 3406 days ago)Fantastic shot, author !
(5 years and 3406 days ago)R E S P E C T
(5 years and 3406 days ago)This shot is within the rules........there is no explicit nudity here.
(5 years and 3406 days ago)"I was under the impression that this type of shot would be acceptable"
(5 years and 3406 days ago)I'm pretty sure it is acceptable. Like I said before, the rules and guidelines state no "explicit" nudity. Your entry is not "explicit" so it should be fine to stay up.
strange this is debated on some then some folks praise another that is very close to the same.
(5 years and 3406 days ago)Both are fine imo.
I think we all knew who shot this one. Interesting that the point of focus seems to be on the writing of the camera strap, it certainly draws your eye there. As always, wonderful work with light and shadow!
(5 years and 3406 days ago)No... your language was fine... I was just kidding
(5 years and 3406 days ago)adeincyprus, I don't see them in ANY beach around here! Nor any of my connecting states.
(5 years and 3407 days ago)angelicviolets...I thought the same thing too but I think the guidelines have changed because now it says in the rules "explicit nudity." If you look up "explicit nudity" online, you'll find that it means that the genitals are uncovered also (genitals are reproductions organs). Only the nipples are showing here and they're not a reproductive external organ.
(5 years and 3407 days ago)A very sexy photograph.... YES.....but there is nudity which is against this contest rules...You are able to see the whole breast including nipple which is considered nudity... I am not a prude by any means and this photo is awesome but in all fairness to everyone else the breasts should not be shown uncovered.
(5 years and 3407 days ago)you see way more than this on any beach.........so where is the problem?
(5 years and 3407 days ago)Knew this was your's
(5 years and 3407 days ago)I knew this had to be your's
(5 years and 3407 days ago)I liked it better last night as far as family friendly goes (because I'm a prude) but I like it better today because it looks more natural with a nipple.
(5 years and 3407 days ago)Sometimes I wonder how this can be a family friendly site with nudity like this, but it doesn't change the fact that this image is sexy and very well photographed.