- photo contests ▼
- photoshop contests ▼
- Tutorials ▼
- Social ▼Contact options
- Stats ▼Results and stats
- More ▼
- Help ▼Help and rules
- Login
Photography and photoshop contests
We are a community of people with
a passion for photography, graphics and art in general.
Every day new photoshop
and photography contests are posted to compete in. We also have one weekly drawing contest
and one weekly 3D contest!
Participation is 100% free!
Just
register and get
started!
Good luck!
© 2015 Pxleyes.com. All rights reserved.
It's appreciated that you played with shapes and rest shapes. The result is interesting, but also confusing. I guess for a logo you need a strong image and although it doesnt have to mean that the viewer has to see without thinking what he/she's looking at, I do think there has to be a certain link with the word PXLEyes. However, as creation nice work. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Clean, but not sure if this will work in the final version. The difference in thickness between PXL and eyes is huge, you may barely see eyes when it's resized. Maybe the same for the outline. It's a matter of trying, I guess. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Fille shows what the problem is about this logo. It's creative, but if you dont know what you should be supposed to read, it's kinda hard to understand. Compared to the typo, I'd expect a graphically bit stronger eye (sharped heavier outline, or no outline at all, use of good radial gradients) than how it is right now. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)The font for PXL is not bad at all, not sure if it all has to be in black. Would be interesting to see if it has the same impact with a lighter color (ie the blue that's used now). I really wouldnt chose for a tagline in perspective and also "eyes.com" needs a more peaceful background & more connection with PXL. But for a digital look, it has a pretty good mood. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, but I agree with OliviasArts. The font may be a bit stronger too, especially when the final logo will be way way smaller. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Very agree with pingenvy. The right part is kinda distracting. This way the funny X also gets more attention. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Nice play with letter, I kinda agree with pingenvy about the candy stick though. Nr 1 and 3 are also a bit hard to read. Only "problem" with nr 2 is how we're supposed to read it? EYESPxl? Maybe a little bit further working. Ah, and it's personal but I'd reduce the amount of lensflare lookalikes . Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Clean and not bad at all. Perhaps some glossy look would give it more style. The pixeled border as how it is now doesnt work for me, in combination with the rest. It's all sharp and one color blue, the border has to be sharped edged too, so it really shows that you decided to make it pixelated. But ok, just my opinion.From the 3, I might go for the middle one since that's the most readable logo. However, I guess a longer stretched logo will work better for this site. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Funny, but I'm not sure if this would work as logo, since it might be all too small if you reduce it to the actual size. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, maybe a bit too much focus on the eye. Curious how it would look like as part of the site. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)It's not bad, you took the PXL kinda litterary. Not sure about how you placed the two words, they dont have much in common together. Maybe this site needs a bit stronger type too. What background color you'd see with this logo? Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Personally I wouldnt go for such background, too distracting from what this site is really about. The font choice is not bad, but maybe a bit too arty and you push the site in a certain direction (i'd prefer a bit more general look). The url under is playful, but lacks any connection with the rest. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, but maybe not the right image for what this site may like to represent. How would you see this as part of the page (I mean, you'd see the bubble all over the site, or the logo would have a border or how much you see from the background?). Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Arty, but I'm afraid it wont work as logo. Too many things happen and you make my poor screen go nuts . Very curious what kinda background you have in mind for the whole site (really those rainbowcolors?!) Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, but I kinda miss connection between the drawing and type, it doesnt make it a whole. Not completely sure about the font either, not the most readable (especially when you'd resize is). Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Boy...I get the idea with pixels, but I'm afraid this wont work in the final size for the logo. Curious how PXL would look like in metallic colors instead of black (right now the black makes it a bit depressive, maybe it's just me). Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, maybe I wouldnt go for a serif font, but that's personal. How many shadows the font has? Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)I like the strong type for PXL. Whie and blue version works here. "Eyes" looks a bit lost, it lacks a bit of connection with PXL, perhaps Reap has a good option to fix that. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, but PXL could stand out more from the background. Now it's mostly Eyes.com that asks a lot of attention and the link with PXL is kinda lost. If you make the url name a tiny bit smaller it will align better with PXL. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Nice that you made the P in pixels, I might have used a bit deeper colors so the shape has more contrast with the background. WHat you may want to add is a tiny bit of white-ish gradient on the lower side of "pxlseyes), so it gets a more shuny effect. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Nice that you used rgb colors, not sure about the font choice. At least the P and X look pixelated, not sure if that was meant to be. Same for the frames behind, I'd make them smooth. Eyes.com is kinda hard to read, maybe a darker border around the letters would help. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, good that you tried some other colors than the blue we know. The shapes look a bit blurry on my screen. I'd align the P, X and L on the same lower level or really let the X stand out more. Now it looks a bit inbetween. The url under will be very hard to read if you resize this image to the final dimensions. Btw you'd like to have the whole page dark/black? Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Funny idea, not sure if I'd go for the font. As said above, maybe a bit too cartoonlike. Also, the logo means more than just eyes. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)The colors and glossy look are nice. I think I get where you wanna go with those e's, but no you can not distort the second e (maybe not done on purpose). What those two dots above the e's are standing for? In case you want to write pixleys.com, try to aling it inbetween PXL (above), may look more stable. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)The eye looks nice, but I'm afraid too much to make it a logo. Apart from that, the eye also pushes you too much to just one side of the meaning of the word PXLEyes. Cusrious what color you'd chose for the rest of the page where this logo would be part of. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Not bad, but imo too hard to read. THe eye is clear, but PXL is barely visible. The ".com" is quite hard to read too. The purple background is possible, I wouldnt chose such heavy black gradient though. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Funny as image, for a logo maybe a bit hard to read. The tags under are sweet ("love", but I guess it's up to MrM to decide if this place is about love or not . I like the font. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)The word PXL is strong and looks ok. Personally I wouldnt use too many different fonts and/or styles or at least not like this, since the rest is a bit harder to read. I'm afraid if you make it smaller the logo will be barely visible
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Your idea is understandable, but I'm afraid the logo will be unreadable this way. Not sure about that kind of green either or the black for background, I guess the main mood will be a bit more cheerful . Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)From the 3 you put there I like the last one most too. I doubt the pixelated edges would work the way you'd like to. I'm afraid when you make the logos smaller, the pixelation will have a negative effect, like we're dealing with a poor quality logo. The third one is cleaner, but also maybe a bit too general. What does this say about the site? Maybe with colored background you can make ".com" in white, to give it a fresher look. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Simple and clean. Certainly not bad, maybe with such heavy black outline for the eyes, I'd expect also a bit heavier font weight for the text, right now it looks a bit out of balance and it's like the eyes are about the smash the text. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)Mmm...it's a bit hard to read. Also, it's up to the viewer how to interpret PXLEyes, so I wouldnt write it there like "pixelize" already. Good luck!
(5 years and 3851 days ago)The X with eye reminds me a bit on the Jetix logo . Looks pretty ok, I kinda agree with OliviasArts about the small size. Maybe the spacing between the p, x and l need to be a tiny bit bigger, but perhaps I'm also wrong . Good luck!
(5 years and 3852 days ago)Pretty nice and clean, but maybe here and there needs some improvements. Right now a bit too many things happen, despite you kept it clean. I agree with Nator about "com", should have the same font size as "eyes". Also, it's a bit out of balance since too many things happen on the left side (some kinda frame, some white lines, huge "pxl". I might have removed the white vertical lines and align "eyes" with PXL (of course also align on right side). The reflection most likely hàs to stay, makes it glossy, but then not sure about the half frame on the left side. If you wanna keep it, at least align the whole logo to the center of the frame. But I do see possibilities here . Good luck!
(5 years and 3852 days ago)Image is ok as it is, whiskers are no must here (after all it's about the smile). HiRes is amazingly big, btw. Good luck!
(5 years and 3852 days ago)Now I wanted to say that the "T" should be an "L", but I see I wasnt fast enough...Style is nice yes, not sure if in just black/white. Good luck!
(5 years and 3852 days ago)SBS looks good, image is nice too . The only thing I might reconsider is that if you put a sword in paper/wood, I guess you'd push the paper more down . But ok, tiny nitpick, nice result! Good luck!
(5 years and 3855 days ago)Freaky idea, would be nice if you could fix the body's angle a bit. Right now the part where the worm's body goes up still looks too much from aside. Maybe if you can make the smaller bodyparts a bit rounder (mmnot easy to explain, but I mean that you see it more from front perspective. A bit like the last half from this image http://www.flickr.com/photos/theju/404228890/sizes/o/), it'll fit better with Lodd's body. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Funny face, but I completely agree with Dan. Give the eye some shading and check in the mirror how your mouth looks like on the inside from that angle. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Yeah, I'd also say that this is a filter...but a highres version or an explanation might help to understand better. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Ehhh.....as OliviasArts said, a lot happens here . In fact no clue what to think for the rest, I just notice that the walls dont make perfect shut corners. Not sure if you'd care about it though . Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Ow well, I kinda like the typography. No clue how the original poster looks like though, would be nice to see where you got your inspiration from. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Haha, too funny! Lodd is really thrilled to see her again . Good job searching the right source, maaaybe I'd put her a bit more to the right and a little bit up, so that Lodd is looking a bit more to her direction, but this is already a nice job. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Good eye for detail . Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Funny idea, but here and there needs some clean up. It would be nice if you could mask the parts thà t way that it matches more with the perspective. And I'd expect the shadow on the left side, but maybe that's just me. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Totally agree about the text. For the rest well done. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Haha, I missed these kinda entries. Some tiny nitpicks here and there, but overall a nice construction and good job. The SBS should be an example for everyone . Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Nice mood! You used some ston texture, which works pretty well for what you want to achieve. But to make the face more a whole, I'd also add (some of) the texture on the skull, so it looks more like there's a connection between the skull part and the rest of the face. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Pretty freaky, but I think I agree with robvdn and Ory. After all, it's not an ugly smile (she has a sweet smile in fact ), but more a freaky head . Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)Good teeth source, but indeed maybe a bit too liquified smile. Maybe the effect would have been even better if the liquify was more subtle. Good luck!
(5 years and 3856 days ago)